Page 19 - MEMOCiberes014-ENG

After the presentations were made by the project coordinators the follow-up panel evaluated the information presented, assessing the following main criteria:
• Suitable development of the project according to the work plan . Percentage of milestones and deliverables reached .
• Taking into consideration (and making suitable modifications) of the recommendations made in the first evaluations by both the Agencia Nacional de Evaluación y Prospectiva (ANEP) and by the External Scientific Advisory Committee of CIBERES (ESAC) .
• Development of suitable fundraising actions and economic viability of the project . • Quality of the follow-up report presented .
After the evaluation, members of the panel wrote a report on each project in which both the evaluations of the criteria mentioned above and a set of recommendations for the better future development of projects was written .
In the process of developing SPs, a new CRP proposal which would have the objective of conducting research in the field of Pulmonary Hypertension was presented in 2014 . Scientific Management gave the proposal a positive assessment and decided to send it for external evaluation by the ANEP and the ESAC, just as the remaining programmes had been evaluated . The proposal was evaluated under the same parameters used to evaluate the remaining SPs already underway, and both the ANEP, which considered it to be excellent and gave it a score of 48/50, and the ESAC gave a positive assessment of the proposal . For organisational and budgetary reasons it was decided that the CRP in Pulmonary Hypertension and its SP would officially start in CIBERES in January 2016 . Meanwhile, this programme has been conducting dissemination and fund-raising activities with the support of CIBERES .
An introduction of each of the CRPs currently underway and their objectives as well as the main results obtained by said programmes up until the end of 2014 is schematically provided below .
www.ciberes.org 19